Tom Ricketts has revealed that the club is currently planning on erecting an iconic silver statue for one of Chicago Cubs’ “Greatest of all Times”.

Tom Ricketts, Chairman of the iconic franchise, has announced plans to erect an iconic silver statue in honor of legendary outfielder Andre Dawson.

The estimated cost of this monumental tribute? A staggering $93.5M. As news of the proposal spreads like wildfire, fans and insiders alike are weighing in on the decision, sparking a heated debate that promises to rage on for weeks to come.

Proponents of the statue argue that it will serve as a lasting tribute to Dawson, who brought immense pride and joy to the team during his eight-year tenure.

They point to his impressive career statistics, including 438 home runs, 1,572 RBIs, and 8 Gold Glove awards. A silver statue, they claim, would be a fitting honor, cementing his legacy and inspiring future generations of players and fans.

Moreover, supporters argue that the statue will be a unique attraction, showcasing the club’s rich history and tradition.

Wrigley Field, already one of the most iconic stadiums in baseball, will be further enhanced by this stunning addition. The statue will become a must-see destination, drawing fans and tourists alike, and boosting the local economy.

The Case Against the Statue

On the other hand, opponents of the statue are vocal in their criticism, citing concerns about the exorbitant cost. $93.5M, they argue, could be better spent on strengthening the team’s roster or improving Wrigley Field.

With the team facing stiff competition in the NL Central, shouldn’t the focus be on building a championship-winning squad, rather than indulging in a luxury item like a statue?

Furthermore, critics point to the current financial situation of the club, which they argue should take priority over a vanity project like a statue.

With debts to service and investments to make, can the Cubs really afford to splash out on a non-essential item?

Alternative Tributes

So, if not a statue, how should the Cubs honor Dawson’s legacy? Some suggest a jersey retirement ceremony, a more low-key and cost-effective way to recognize his contributions.

Others propose naming a stadium or facility after him, a lasting tribute that would inspire future generations.

The Bigger Picture

As we deliberate, it’s essential to consider the broader implications of this decision. What message does this send to fans and players about the club’s priorities?

Is this a wise investment, or a vanity project? How will this impact the team’s performance and morale?

Join the Discussion

We want to hear from you! Share your thoughts on the proposed statue. Should the Cubs proceed with the plans, or are there more pressing priorities for the team? Do you have an alternative suggestion for honoring Dawson’s legacy? Let’s continue the conversation in the comments!